Abstract
The blurry line between nefarious fake news and protected-speech satire hasbeen a notorious struggle for social media platforms. Further to the efforts ofreducing exposure to misinformation on social media, purveyors of fake newshave begun to masquerade as satire sites to avoid being demoted. In this work,we address the challenge of automatically classifying fake news versus satire.Previous work have studied whether fake news and satire can be distinguishedbased on language differences. Contrary to fake news, satire stories areusually humorous and carry some political or social message. We hypothesizethat these nuances could be identified using semantic and linguistic cues.Consequently, we train a machine learning method using semantic representation,with a state-of-the-art contextual language model, and with linguistic featuresbased on textual coherence metrics. Empirical evaluation attests to the meritsof our approach compared to the language-based baseline and sheds light on thenuances between fake news and satire. As avenues for future work, we considerstudying additional linguistic features related to the humor aspect, andenriching the data with current news events, to help identify a political orsocial message.