Abstract
Simplified swarm optimisation (SSO) updates each variable by one draw that copies the global or personal best, keeps the current value or redraws uniformly, with probabilities $c_g$, $c_p$, $c_w$ and $c_r$. As a finite Markov chain under frozen memory, its coordinate kernel $c_w I + (1 - c_w)Π$ has an explicit stationary law and exact convergence rate $c_w^t$. The elitist chain has a geometric hitting-time bound, from a non-optimal start a fixed $c_r$ needs at least $\exp(nc_r/2)$ expected evaluations to reach a unique optimum, and a coupling under changing memories gives $O(n\log n)$ and $O(n^2)$ expected generations on OneMax and LeadingOnes for every population size with redraw share of order $1/n$ and no inertia, and within a $\log n$ factor for fixed inertia. With a frozen memory, inertia cannot speed up first entry into any set from stationary positions, though it can from others. Where the three reference values agree, only $c_r$ acts; where they disagree, copy branches recombine the memories, forcing a redraw only where no active branch holds the target value. Branch logging and checkpoint replay show inertia slowed the tested OneMax and LeadingOnes runs and suggest memory-mediated gains on wider gaps. On Jump functions SSO needed 3.8--8.9 times fewer evaluations than the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm with rate $1/n$, but no consistent advantage over rate-adjusted mutation or a $(μ+1)$ genetic algorithm with uniform crossover was established. The analytical redraw rule improved six of eight benchmark--setting pairs and redundancy allocation, but was slower than $c_r = 0.1$ on Jump$_2$.