Abstract
AI systems must often maintain bounded memory of unbounded interaction histories. However, optimizing the memory representation, and its updates, for downstream task utility is difficult for standard reinforcement learning (RL) due to severe credit assignment bottlenecks induced by sparse, delayed rewards. We introduce MaxIM (Maximally Informative Incremental Memory), a framework that formulates incremental summarization as a capacity-constrained, information-theoretic reward-shaping problem. Grounded in value suboptimality bounds, we show that bounding sequential information loss motivates maximizing the predictive log-likelihood of future, task-relevant targets, a variational lower bound on predictive sufficiency. We introduce a recursive consistency condition to ensure summaries are grounded by maximizing mutual information (MI) with the observed history. We mitigate credit assignment issues with a parameterized asymmetric critic that computes step-wise variational MI bounds for dense reward shaping. Empirical evaluation on long-horizon scientific reading and multi-turn dialogue benchmarks shows that MaxIM outperforms RL, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt-focused baselines on factual grounding, comprehensive autorater metrics, and downstream task utility across strict token budgets and extended horizons, without the need for expensive human preference labels.