Abstract
Multi-turn LLM agents often receive sparse task feedback across several interactions, while generating each response token by token. This creates two related credit-assignment questions: which responses helped achieve the outcome, and which generation decisions mattered within each response? Existing methods typically focus on only one level: turn-level methods evaluate complete responses but do not distinguish the decisions within them; token-level methods can propagate feedback across turns but do not explicitly model credit for each response. These complementary limitations motivate learning credit at both levels and coordinating it in a single policy update. We introduce VETTA, a credit assignment method that jointly learns turn- and token-level values through separate heads on a shared lightweight critic. VETTA computes advantages along both temporal sequences and combines each turn advantage with a within-response-centered token residual for PPO updates. Furthermore, to reduce value-learning cost, the critic retains only early Transformer blocks from the pretrained checkpoint used to initialize the actor. Experiments on four agent benchmarks demonstrate VETTA's strong performance. With Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, VETTA achieves success rates of 95.5% on ALFWorld, 76.0% on WebShop, and 52.2% on ScienceWorld. With Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct, it reaches 84.9% and 80.7% success on Sokoban under sparse and dense rewards, respectively. Critic-depth comparisons further show strong task performance with substantially lower critic-side computation. These results demonstrate that coordinating turn- and token-level credit with a lightweight shared critic improves agent performance while keeping value estimation efficient. Code is available at https://github.com/Jiaju-Chen/VETTA-official.