Abstract
Increasing evidence demonstrates that in many places language coexistence hasbecome ubiquitous and essential for supporting language and cultural diversityand associated with its financial and economic benefits. The competitiveevolution among multiple languages determines the evolution outcome, eithercoexistence, decline, or extinction. Here, we extend the Abrams-Strogatz modelof language competition to multiple languages and then validate it by analyzingthe behavioral transitions of language usage over the recent several decades inSingapore and Hong Kong. In each case, we estimate from data the modelparameters that measure each language utility for its speakers and the strengthof two biases, the majority preference for their language, and the minorityaversion to it. The values of these two biases decide which language is thefastest growing in the competition and what would be the stable state of thesystem. We also study the system convergence time to stable states and discoverthe existence of tipping points with multiple attractors. Moreover, thecritical slowdown of convergence to the stable fractions of language usersappears near and peaks at the tipping points, signaling when the systemapproaches them. Our analysis furthers our understanding of multiple languageevolution and the role of tipping points in behavioral transitions. Theseinsights may help to protect languages from extinction and retain the languageand cultural diversity.