Abstract
Most research on hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) focuses on factual description tasks that prohibit any output absent from the image. However, little attention has been paid to hallucinations in voluntary imagination tasks, such as story writing, despite this human-like cognitive ability being essential for real-world generative applications. To address this limitation, we introduce Voluntary-imagined Object Presence Evaluation (VOPE) -- a recheck-based evaluation benchmark for assessing LVLMs' grounding behavior in voluntary imagination tasks. Specifically, VOPE poses recheck-based questions to evaluate how an LVLM interprets the presence of the imagined objects in its own response. Rather than penalizing the imagined content itself, VOPE identifies hallucinations based on the correctness of the model's presence judgments for the generated objects. Built on this idea, we construct a dataset covering captioning, reasoning, and writing tasks with different levels of voluntary imagination. We apply VOPE to several mainstream LVLMs and hallucination mitigation methods, revealing two key findings: (1) most LVLMs hallucinate heavily during voluntary imagination, and their performance in presence evaluation is notably poor on imagined objects; (2) existing hallucination mitigation methods show limited effect in voluntary imagination tasks, making this an important direction for future research.