Abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has made considerable advances in simulated and physical robot control tasks, especially when problems admit a fully observed Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation. When observations only partially capture the underlying state, the problem becomes a Partially Observable MDP (POMDP), and performance rankings between algorithms can change. We empirically compare Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3), and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) on representative POMDP variants of continuous-control benchmarks. Contrary to widely reported MDP results where TD3 and SAC typically outperform PPO, we observe an inversion: PPO attains higher robustness under partial observability. We attribute this to the stabilizing effect of multi-step bootstrapping. Furthermore, incorporating multi-step targets into TD3 (MTD3) and SAC (MSAC) improves their robustness. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting and adapting DRL algorithms in partially observable settings without requiring new theoretical machinery.