Abstract
Tool-integrated reasoning agents interleaving natural language deliberation with external API calls show promise for complex multi-step tasks. However, aligning such agents for high-stakes domain-specific deployment is challenging, as existing reinforcement learning uses coarse binary rewards (success/failure) that insufficiently guide nuanced tool invocation in production. We present ToolRLA, a three-stage post-training pipeline (Supervised Fine-Tuning, Group Relative Policy Optimization, Direct Preference Optimization) for domain-specific tool-integrated agents. Its core is a fine-grained reward function with multiplicative correctness decomposition, evaluating tool invocation across four dimensions: format validity, tool selection correctness, invocation efficiency, and domain constraint compliance. Multiplicative composition prioritizes correct tool selection (a prerequisite for meaningful parameter evaluation), while a large negative compliance penalty (λ=10) ensures regulatory adherence. Deployed on a real-world financial advisory copilot (80+ advisors, 1,200+ daily queries, 15+ heterogeneous APIs), ToolRLA achieves 47% higher end-to-end task completion (62% to 91%), 63% lower tool invocation error (38% to 14%), 93% lower regulatory violation (12% to 0.8%), and sub-2-second latency after three months. Ablation studies confirm fine-grained reward decomposition contributes 7 percentage points over coarse additive rewards; generalizability is validated on ToolBench and API-Bank.