Abstract
When people pursue rewards in stochastic environments, they often match theirchoice frequencies to the observed target frequencies, even when this policy isdemonstrably sub-optimal. We used a ``hide and seek'' task to evaluate thisbehavior under conditions where pursuit (seeking) could be toggled to avoidance(hiding), while leaving the probability distribution fixed, or varyingcomplexity by changing the number of possible choices. We developed a model forparticipant choice built from choice frequency histograms treated as vectors.We posited the existence of a probability antimatching strategy for avoidance(hiding) rounds, and formalized this as a vector reflection of probabilitymatching. We found that only two basis policies: matching/antimatching andmaximizing/minimizing were sufficient to account for participant choices acrossa range of room numbers and opponent probability distributions. This schemarequires only that people have the ability to remember the relative frequencyof the different outcomes. With this knowledge simple operations can constructthe maximizing and minimizing policies as well as matching and antimatchingstrategies. A mixture of these two policies captures human choice patterns in astochastic environment.