Abstract
In this paper, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibitconspiratorial tendencies, whether they display sociodemographic biases in thisdomain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorialperspectives. Conspiracy beliefs play a central role in the spread ofmisinformation and in shaping distrust toward institutions, making them acritical testbed for evaluating the social fidelity of LLMs. LLMs areincreasingly used as proxies for studying human behavior, yet little is knownabout whether they reproduce higher-order psychological constructs such as aconspiratorial mindset. To bridge this research gap, we administer validatedpsychometric surveys measuring conspiracy mindset to multiple models underdifferent prompting and conditioning strategies. Our findings reveal that LLMsshow partial agreement with elements of conspiracy belief, and conditioningwith socio-demographic attributes produces uneven effects, exposing latentdemographic biases. Moreover, targeted prompts can easily shift model responsestoward conspiratorial directions, underscoring both the susceptibility of LLMsto manipulation and the potential risks of their deployment in sensitivecontexts. These results highlight the importance of critically evaluating thepsychological dimensions embedded in LLMs, both to advance computational socialscience and to inform possible mitigation strategies against harmful uses.