Abstract
Recent advancements in Reinforcement Post-Training (RPT) have significantlyenhanced the capabilities of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), sparking increasedinterest in the generalization of RL-based reasoning. While existing work hasprimarily focused on investigating its generalization across tasks ormodalities, this study proposes a novel cross-linguistic perspective toinvestigate reasoning generalization. This raises a crucial question:$\textit{Does the reasoning capability achieved from English RPT effectivelytransfer to other languages?}$ We address this by systematically evaluatingEnglish-centric LRMs on multilingual reasoning benchmarks and introducing ametric to quantify cross-lingual transferability. Our findings reveal thatcross-lingual transferability varies significantly across initial model, targetlanguage, and training paradigm. Through interventional studies, we find thatmodels with stronger initial English capabilities tend to over-rely onEnglish-specific patterns, leading to diminished cross-lingual generalization.To address this, we conduct a thorough parallel training study. Experimentalresults yield three key findings: $\textbf{First-Parallel Leap}$, a substantialleap in performance when transitioning from monolingual to just a singleparallel language, and a predictable $\textbf{Parallel Scaling Law}$, revealingthat cross-lingual reasoning transfer follows a power-law with the number oftraining parallel languages. Moreover, we identify the discrepancy betweenactual monolingual performance and the power-law prediction as$\textbf{Monolingual Generalization Gap}$, indicating that English-centric LRMsfail to fully generalize across languages. Our study challenges the assumptionthat LRM reasoning mirrors human cognition, providing critical insights for thedevelopment of more language-agnostic LRMs.