Abstract
Mental health assessment is crucial for early intervention and effectivetreatment, yet traditional clinician-based approaches are limited by theshortage of qualified professionals. Recent advances in artificial intelligencehave sparked growing interest in automated psychological assessment, yet mostexisting approaches are constrained by their reliance on static text analysis,limiting their ability to capture deeper and more informative insights thatemerge through dynamic interaction and iterative questioning. Therefore, inthis paper, we propose a multi-agent framework for mental health evaluationthat simulates clinical doctor-patient dialogues, with specialized agentsassigned to questioning, adequacy evaluation, scoring, and updating. Weintroduce an adaptive questioning mechanism in which an evaluation agentassesses the adequacy of user responses to determine the necessity ofgenerating targeted follow-up queries to address ambiguity and missinginformation. Additionally, we employ a tree-structured memory in which the rootnode encodes the user's basic information, while child nodes (e.g., topic andstatement) organize key information according to distinct symptom categoriesand interaction turns. This memory is dynamically updated throughout theinteraction to reduce redundant questioning and further enhance the informationextraction and contextual tracking capabilities. Experimental results on theDAIC-WOZ dataset illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, whichachieves better performance than existing approaches.