Abstract
Committee-selection problems arise in many contexts and applications, andthere has been increasing interest within the social choice research communityon identifying which properties are satisfied by different multi-winner votingrules. In this work, we propose a data-driven framework to evaluate howfrequently voting rules violate axioms across diverse preference distributionsin practice, shifting away from the binary perspective of axiom satisfactiongiven by worst-case analysis. Using this framework, we analyze the relationshipbetween multi-winner voting rules and their axiomatic performance under severalpreference distributions. We then show that neural networks, acting as votingrules, can outperform traditional rules in minimizing axiom violations. Ourresults suggest that data-driven approaches to social choice can inform thedesign of new voting systems and support the continuation of data-drivenresearch in social choice.