Abstract
Fairness in machine learning research is commonly framed in the context ofclassification tasks, leaving critical gaps in regression. In this paper, wepropose a novel approach to measure intersectional fairness in regressiontasks, going beyond the focus on single protected attributes from existing workto consider combinations of all protected attributes. Furthermore, we contendthat it is insufficient to measure the average error of groups without regardfor imbalanced domain preferences. Accordingly, we propose IntersectionalDivergence (ID) as the first fairness measure for regression tasks that 1)describes fair model behavior across multiple protected attributes and 2)differentiates the impact of predictions in target ranges most relevant tousers. We extend our proposal demonstrating how ID can be adapted into a lossfunction, IDLoss, that satisfies convergence guarantees and has piecewisesmooth properties that enable practical optimization. Through an extensiveexperimental evaluation, we demonstrate how ID allows unique insights intomodel behavior and fairness, and how incorporating IDLoss into optimization canconsiderably improve single-attribute and intersectional model fairness whilemaintaining a competitive balance in predictive performance.