Abstract
Exposure to large language model output is rapidly increasing. How willseeing AI-generated ideas affect human ideas? We conducted an experiment (800+participants, 40+ countries) where participants viewed creative ideas that werefrom ChatGPT or prior experimental participants and then brainstormed their ownidea. We varied the number of AI-generated examples (none, low, or highexposure) and if the examples were labeled as 'AI' (disclosure). Our dynamicexperiment design -- ideas from prior participants in an experimental conditionare used as stimuli for future participants in the same experimental condition-- speaks to the interdependent process of cultural creation: creative ideasare built upon prior ideas. Hence, we capture the compounding effects of havingLLMs 'in the culture loop'. We find that high AI exposure (but not low AIexposure) did not affect the creativity of individual ideas but did increasethe average amount and rate of change of collective idea diversity. AI madeideas different, not better. There were no main effects of disclosure. We alsofound that self-reported creative people were less influenced by knowing anidea was from AI and that participants may knowingly adopt AI ideas when thetask is difficult. Our findings suggest that introducing AI ideas may increasecollective diversity but not individual creativity.