Abstract
This chapter introduces a conceptual framework for qualitative riskassessment of AI, particularly in the context of the EU AI Act. The frameworkaddresses the complexities of legal compliance and fundamental rightsprotection by itegrating definitional balancing and defeasible reasoning.Definitional balancing employs proportionality analysis to resolve conflictsbetween competing rights, while defeasible reasoning accommodates the dynamicnature of legal decision-making. Our approach stresses the need for an analysisof AI deployment scenarios and for identifying potential legal violations andmulti-layered impacts on fundamental rights. On the basis of this analysis, weprovide philosophical foundations for a logical account of AI risk analysis. Inparticular, we consider the basic building blocks for conceptually grasping theinteraction between AI deployment scenarios and fundamental rights,incorporating in defeasible reasoning definitional balancing and argumentsabout the contextual promotion or demotion of rights. This layered approachallows for more operative models of assessment of both high-risk AI systems andGeneral Purpose AI (GPAI) systems, emphasizing the broader applicability of thelatter. Future work aims to develop a formal model and effective algorithms toenhance AI risk assessment, bridging theoretical insights with practicalapplications to support responsible AI governance.