Abstract
We present the LLM Economist, a novel framework that uses agent-basedmodeling to design and assess economic policies in strategic environments withhierarchical decision-making. At the lower level, bounded rational workeragents -- instantiated as persona-conditioned prompts sampled from U.S.Census-calibrated income and demographic statistics -- choose labor supply tomaximize text-based utility functions learned in-context. At the upper level, aplanner agent employs in-context reinforcement learning to proposepiecewise-linear marginal tax schedules anchored to the current U.S. federalbrackets. This construction endows economic simulacra with three capabilitiesrequisite for credible fiscal experimentation: (i) optimization ofheterogeneous utilities, (ii) principled generation of large, demographicallyrealistic agent populations, and (iii) mechanism design -- the ultimate nudgingproblem -- expressed entirely in natural language. Experiments with populationsof up to one hundred interacting agents show that the planner converges nearStackelberg equilibria that improve aggregate social welfare relative to Saezsolutions, while a periodic, persona-level voting procedure furthers thesegains under decentralized governance. These results demonstrate that largelanguage model-based agents can jointly model, simulate, and govern complexeconomic systems, providing a tractable test bed for policy evaluation at thesocietal scale to help build better civilizations.