Abstract
Evaluating causal treatment effects in observational studies requiresaddressing confounding. While the back-door criterion enables identificationthrough adjustment for observed covariates, it fails in the presence ofunmeasured confounding. The front-door criterion offers an alternative byleveraging variables that fully mediate the treatment effect and are unaffectedby unmeasured confounders of the treatment-outcome pair. We develop novelone-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the averagetreatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated underfront-door assumptions. Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizationsof the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid modeling themediator density entirely, and are compatible with flexible, machinelearning-based nuisance estimation. We establish conditions for root-$n$consistency and asymptotic linearity by deriving second-order remainder bounds.We also develop flexible tests for assessing identification assumptions,including a doubly robust testing procedure, within a semiparametric extensionof the front-door model that encodes generalized (Verma) independenceconstraints. We further show how these constraints can be leveraged to improvethe efficiency of causal effect estimators. Simulation studies confirmfavorable finite-sample performance, and real-data applications in educationand emergency medicine illustrate the practical utility of our methods. Anaccompanying R package, fdcausal, implements all proposed procedures.