Abstract
Standard language ideology is reflected and reinforced in language generatedby large language models (LLMs). We present a faceted taxonomy of open problemsthat illustrate how standard language ideology manifests in AI-generatedlanguage, alongside implications for minoritized language communities andsociety more broadly. We introduce the concept of standard AI-generatedlanguage ideology, a process through which LLMs position "standard"languages--particularly Standard American English (SAE)--as the linguisticdefault, reinforcing the perception that SAE is the most "appropriate"language. We then discuss ongoing tensions around what constitutes desirablesystem behavior, as well as advantages and drawbacks of generative AI toolsattempting, or refusing, to imitate different English language varieties.Rather than prescribing narrow technical fixes, we offer three recommendationsfor researchers, practitioners, and funders that focus on shifting structuralconditions and supporting more emancipatory outcomes for diverse languagecommunities.