Abstract
We are increasingly subjected to the power of AI authorities. As AI decisionsbecome inescapable, entering domains such as healthcare, education, and law, wemust confront a vital question: how can we ensure AI systems have thelegitimacy necessary for effective governance? This essay argues that to secureAI legitimacy, we need methods that engage the public in designing andconstraining AI systems, ensuring these technologies reflect the community'sshared values. Constitutional AI, proposed by Anthropic, represents a steptowards this goal, offering a model for democratic control of AI. However,while Constitutional AI's commitment to hardcoding explicit principles into AImodels enhances transparency and accountability, it falls short in two crucialaspects: addressing the opacity of individual AI decisions and fosteringgenuine democratic legitimacy. To overcome these limitations, this essayproposes "Public Constitutional AI." This approach envisions a participatoryprocess where diverse stakeholders, including ordinary citizens, deliberate onthe principles guiding AI development. The resulting "AI Constitution" wouldcarry the legitimacy of popular authorship, grounding AI governance in thepublic will. Furthermore, the essay proposes "AI Courts" to develop "AI caselaw," providing concrete examples for operationalizing constitutionalprinciples in AI training. This evolving combination of constitutionalprinciples and case law aims to make AI governance more responsive to publicvalues. By grounding AI governance in deliberative democratic processes, PublicConstitutional AI offers a path to imbue automated authorities with genuinedemocratic legitimacy, addressing the unique challenges posed by increasinglypowerful AI systems while ensuring their alignment with the public interest.