Abstract
Queer people are often discussed as targets of bias, harm, or discriminationin research on generative AI. However, the specific ways that queer peopleengage with generative AI, and thus possible uses that support queer people,have yet to be explored. We conducted a workshop study with 13 queer artists,during which we gave participants access to GPT-4 and DALL-E 3 and facilitatedgroup sensemaking activities. We found our participants struggled to use thesemodels due to various normative values embedded in their designs, such ashyper-positivity and anti-sexuality. We describe various strategies ourparticipants developed to overcome these models' limitations and how,nevertheless, our participants found value in these highly-normativetechnologies. Drawing on queer feminist theory, we discuss implications for theconceptualization of "state-of-the-art" models and consider how FAccTresearchers might support queer alternatives.