Abstract
The proliferation of NLP-powered language technologies, AI-based naturallanguage generation models, and English as a mainstream means of communicationamong both native and non-native speakers make the output of AI-powered toolsespecially intriguing to linguists. This paper investigates how Grammarly andChatGPT affect the English language regarding wordiness vs. conciseness. A casestudy focusing on the purpose subordinator in order to is presented toillustrate the way in which Grammarly and ChatGPT recommend shorter grammaticalstructures instead of longer and more elaborate ones. Although the analysedsentences were produced by native speakers, are perfectly correct, and wereextracted from a language corpus of contemporary English, both Grammarly andChatGPT suggest more conciseness and less verbosity, even for relatively shortsentences. The present article argues that technologies such as Grammarly notonly mirror language change but also have the potential to facilitate oraccelerate it.