Abstract
The more AI agents are deployed in scenarios with possibly unexpectedsituations, the more they need to be flexible, adaptive, and creative inachieving the goal we have given them. Thus, a certain level of freedom tochoose the best path to the goal is inherent in making AI robust and flexibleenough. At the same time, however, the pervasive deployment of AI in our life,whether AI is autonomous or collaborating with humans, raises several ethicalchallenges. AI agents should be aware and follow appropriate ethical principlesand should thus exhibit properties such as fairness or other virtues. Theseethical principles should define the boundaries of AI's freedom and creativity.However, it is still a challenge to understand how to specify and reason withethical boundaries in AI agents and how to combine them appropriately withsubjective preferences and goal specifications. Some initial attempts employeither a data-driven example-based approach for both, or a symbolic rule-basedapproach for both. We envision a modular approach where any AI technique can beused for any of these essential ingredients in decision making or decisionsupport systems, paired with a contextual approach to define their combinationand relative weight. In a world where neither humans nor AI systems work inisolation, but are tightly interconnected, e.g., the Internet of Things, wealso envision a compositional approach to building ethically bounded AI, wherethe ethical properties of each component can be fruitfully exploited to derivethose of the overall system. In this paper we define and motivate the notion ofethically-bounded AI, we describe two concrete examples, and we outline someoutstanding challenges.