Abstract
We present a theoretical framework assessing the economic implications ofbias in AI-powered emergency response systems. Integrating health economics,welfare economics, and artificial intelligence, we analyze how algorithmic biasaffects resource allocation, health outcomes, and social welfare. Byincorporating a bias function into health production and social welfare models,we quantify its impact on demographic groups, showing that bias leads tosuboptimal resource distribution, increased costs, and welfare losses. Theframework highlights efficiency-equity trade-offs and provides economicinterpretations. We propose mitigation strategies, includingfairness-constrained optimization, algorithmic adjustments, and policyinterventions. Our findings offer insights for policymakers, emergency serviceproviders, and technology developers, emphasizing the need for AI systems thatare efficient and equitable. By addressing the economic consequences of biasedAI, this study contributes to policies and technologies promoting fairness,efficiency, and social welfare in emergency response services.