Abstract
Aligning language models (LMs) based on human-annotated preference data is acrucial step in obtaining practical and performant LM-based systems. However,multilingual human preference data are difficult to obtain at scale, making itchallenging to extend this framework to diverse languages. In this work, weevaluate a simple approach for zero-shot cross-lingual alignment, where areward model is trained on preference data in one source language and directlyapplied to other target languages. On summarization and open-ended dialoggeneration, we show that this method is consistently successful undercomprehensive evaluation settings, including human evaluation: cross-linguallyaligned models are preferred by humans over unaligned models on up to >70% ofevaluation instances. We moreover find that a different-language reward modelsometimes yields better aligned models than a same-language reward model. Wealso identify best practices when there is no language-specific data for evensupervised finetuning, another component in alignment.