Abstract
Although 3D generated content (3DGC) offers advantages in reducing productioncosts and accelerating design timelines, its quality often falls short whencompared to 3D professionally generated content. Common quality issuesfrequently affect 3DGC, highlighting the importance of timely and effectivequality assessment. Such evaluations not only ensure a higher standard of 3DGCsfor end-users but also provide critical insights for advancing generativetechnologies. To address existing gaps in this domain, this paper introduces anovel 3DGC quality assessment dataset, 3DGCQA, built using 7 representativeText-to-3D generation methods. During the dataset's construction, 50 fixedprompts are utilized to generate contents across all methods, resulting in thecreation of 313 textured meshes that constitute the 3DGCQA dataset. Thevisualization intuitively reveals the presence of 6 common distortioncategories in the generated 3DGCs. To further explore the quality of the 3DGCs,subjective quality assessment is conducted by evaluators, whose ratings revealsignificant variation in quality across different generation methods.Additionally, several objective quality assessment algorithms are tested on the3DGCQA dataset. The results expose limitations in the performance of existingalgorithms and underscore the need for developing more specialized qualityassessment methods. To provide a valuable resource for future research anddevelopment in 3D content generation and quality assessment, the dataset hasbeen open-sourced in https://github.com/zyj-2000/3DGCQA.