Abstract
How are the merits of innovative ideas communicated in science? Here weconduct semantic analyses of grant application success with a focus onscientific promotional language, which has been growing in frequency in manycontexts and purportedly may convey an innovative idea's originality andsignificance. Our analysis attempts to surmount limitations of prior studies byexamining the full text of tens of thousands of both funded and unfunded grantsfrom three leading public and private funding agencies: the NIH, the NSF, andthe Novo Nordisk Foundation, one of the world's largest private sciencefoundations. We find a robust association between promotional language and thesupport and adoption of innovative ideas by funders and other scientists.First, the percentage of promotional language in a grant proposal is associatedwith up to a doubling of the grant's probability of being funded. Second, agrant's promotional language reflects its intrinsic level of innovativeness.Third, the percentage of promotional language predicts the expected citationand productivity impact of publications that are supported by funded grants.Lastly, a computer-assisted experiment that manipulates the promotionallanguage in our data demonstrates how promotional language can communicate themerit of ideas through cognitive activation. With the incidence of promotionallanguage in science steeply rising, and the pivotal role of grants inconverting promising and aspirational ideas into solutions, our analysisprovides empirical evidence that promotional language is associated witheffectively communicating the merits of innovative scientific ideas.