Abstract
Despite their tremendous success in many applications, large language modelsoften fall short of consistent reasoning and planning in various (language,embodied, and social) scenarios, due to inherent limitations in theirinference, learning, and modeling capabilities. In this position paper, wepresent a new perspective of machine reasoning, LAW, that connects the conceptsof Language models, Agent models, and World models, for more robust andversatile reasoning capabilities. In particular, we propose that world andagent models are a better abstraction of reasoning, that introduces the crucialelements of deliberate human-like reasoning, including beliefs about the worldand other agents, anticipation of consequences, goals/rewards, and strategicplanning. Crucially, language models in LAW serve as a backend to implement thesystem or its elements and hence provide the computational power andadaptability. We review the recent studies that have made relevant progress anddiscuss future research directions towards operationalizing the LAW framework.