Abstract
A rapidly growing number of voices have argued that AI research, and computervision in particular, is closely tied to mass surveillance. Yet the direct pathfrom computer vision research to surveillance has remained obscured anddifficult to assess. This study reveals the Surveillance AI pipeline. We obtainthree decades of computer vision research papers and downstream patents (morethan 20,000 documents) and present a rich qualitative and quantitativeanalysis. This analysis exposes the nature and extent of the Surveillance AIpipeline, its institutional roots and evolution, and ongoing patterns ofobfuscation. We first perform an in-depth content analysis of computer visionpapers and downstream patents, identifying and quantifying key features and themany, often subtly expressed, forms of surveillance that appear. On the basisof this analysis, we present a topology of Surveillance AI that characterizesthe prevalent targeting of human data, practices of data transferal, andinstitutional data use. We find stark evidence of close ties between computervision and surveillance. The majority (68%) of annotated computer vision papersand patents self-report their technology enables data extraction about humanbodies and body parts and even more (90%) enable data extraction about humansin general.