Abstract
Consistently checking the statistical significance of experimental results isone of the mandatory methodological steps to address the so-called"reproducibility crisis" in deep reinforcement learning. In this tutorialpaper, we explain how the number of random seeds relates to the probabilitiesof statistical errors. For both the t-test and the bootstrap confidenceinterval test, we recall theoretical guidelines to determine the number ofrandom seeds one should use to provide a statistically significant comparisonof the performance of two algorithms. Finally, we discuss the influence ofdeviations from the assumptions usually made by statistical tests. We show thatthey can lead to inaccurate evaluations of statistical errors and provideguidelines to counter these negative effects. We make our code available toperform the tests.