Abstract
Supply chain operations traditionally involve a variety of complex decisionmaking problems. Over the last few decades, supply chains greatly benefitedfrom advances in computation, which allowed the transition from manualprocessing to automation and cost-effective optimization. Nonetheless, businessoperators still need to spend substantial efforts in \emph{explaining} andinterpreting the optimization outcomes to stakeholders. Motivated by the recentadvances in Large Language Models (LLMs), we study how this disruptivetechnology can help bridge the gap between supply chain automation and humancomprehension and trust thereof. We design \name{} -- a framework that acceptsas input queries in plain text, and outputs insights about the underlyingoptimization outcomes. Our framework does not forgo the state-of-the-artcombinatorial optimization technology, but rather leverages it toquantitatively answer what-if scenarios (e.g., how would the cost change if weused supplier B instead of supplier A for a given demand?). Importantly, ourdesign does not require sending proprietary data over to LLMs, which can be aprivacy concern in some circumstances. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ourframework on a real server placement scenario within Microsoft's cloud supplychain. Along the way, we develop a general evaluation benchmark, which can beused to evaluate the accuracy of the LLM output in other scenarios.