SmoothGrad and VarGrad are techniques that enhance the empirical quality ofstandard saliency maps by adding noise to input. However, there were few worksthat provide a rigorous theoretical interpretation of those methods. Weanalytically formalize the result of these noise-adding methods. As a result,we observe two interesting results from the existing noise-adding methods.First, SmoothGrad does not make the gradient of the score function smooth.Second, VarGrad is independent of the gradient of the score function. Webelieve that our findings provide a clue to reveal the relationship betweenlocal explanation methods of deep neural networks and higher-order partialderivatives of the score function.