While social media empowers freedom of expression and individual voices, italso enables anti-social behavior, online harassment, cyberbullying, and hatespeech. In this paper, we deepen our understanding of online hate speech byfocusing on a largely neglected but crucial aspect of hate speech -- itstarget: either "directed" towards a specific person or entity, or "generalized"towards a group of people sharing a common protected characteristic. We performthe first linguistic and psycholinguistic analysis of these two forms of hatespeech and reveal the presence of interesting markers that distinguish thesetypes of hate speech. Our analysis reveals that Directed hate speech, inaddition to being more personal and directed, is more informal, angrier, andoften explicitly attacks the target (via name calling) with fewer analyticwords and more words suggesting authority and influence. Generalized hatespeech, on the other hand, is dominated by religious hate, is characterized bythe use of lethal words such as murder, exterminate, and kill; and quantitywords such as million and many. Altogether, our work provides a data-drivenanalysis of the nuances of online-hate speech that enables not only a deepenedunderstanding of hate speech and its social implications but also itsdetection.