Abstract
Sender-receiver interactions, and specifically persuasion games, are widelyresearched in economic modeling and artificial intelligence. However, in theclassic persuasion games setting, the messages sent from the expert to thedecision-maker (DM) are abstract or well-structured signals rather than naturallanguage messages. This paper addresses the use of natural language inpersuasion games. For this purpose, we conduct an online repeated interactionexperiment. At each trial of the interaction, an informed expert aims to sellan uninformed decision-maker a vacation in a hotel, by sending her a reviewthat describes the hotel. While the expert is exposed to several scoredreviews, the decision-maker observes only the single review sent by the expert,and her payoff in case she chooses to take the hotel is a random draw from thereview score distribution available to the expert only. We also compare thebehavioral patterns in this experiment to the equivalent patterns in similarexperiments where the communication is based on the numerical values of thereviews rather than the reviews' text, and observe substantial differenceswhich can be explained through an equilibrium analysis of the game. We considera number of modeling approaches for our verbal communication setup, differingfrom each other in the model type (deep neural network vs. linear classifier),the type of features used by the model (textual, behavioral or both) and thesource of the textual features (DNN-based vs. hand-crafted). Our resultsdemonstrate that given a prefix of the interaction sequence, our models canpredict the future decisions of the decision-maker, particularly when asequential modeling approach and hand-crafted textual features are applied.Further analysis of the hand-crafted textual features allows us to make initialobservations about the aspects of text that drive decision making in our setup