Online discussion platforms offer a forum to strengthen and propagate beliefin misinformed conspiracy theories. Yet, they also offer avenues for conspiracytheorists to express their doubts and experiences of cognitive dissonance. Suchexpressions of dissonance may shed light on who abandons misguided beliefs andunder which circumstances. This paper characterizes self-disclosures ofdissonance about QAnon, a conspiracy theory initiated by a mysterious leader Qand popularized by their followers, anons in conspiracy theory subreddits. Tounderstand what dissonance and disbelief mean within conspiracy communities, wefirst characterize their social imaginaries, a broad understanding of howpeople collectively imagine their social existence. Focusing on 2K posts fromtwo image boards, 4chan and 8chan, and 1.2 M comments and posts from 12subreddits dedicated to QAnon, we adopt a mixed methods approach to uncover thesymbolic language representing the movement, expectations, practices, heroesand foes of the QAnon community. We use these social imaginaries to create acomputational framework for distinguishing belief and dissonance from generaldiscussion about QAnon. Further, analyzing user engagement with QAnonconspiracy subreddits, we find that self-disclosures of dissonance correlatewith a significant decrease in user contributions and ultimately with theirdeparture from the community. We contribute a computational framework foridentifying dissonance self-disclosures and measuring the changes in userengagement surrounding dissonance. Our work can provide insights into designingdissonance-based interventions that can potentially dissuade conspiracists fromonline conspiracy discussion communities.