Since its beginning in the 1950s, the field of artificial intelligence hascycled several times between periods of optimistic predictions and massiveinvestment ("AI spring") and periods of disappointment, loss of confidence, andreduced funding ("AI winter"). Even with today's seemingly fast pace of AIbreakthroughs, the development of long-promised technologies such asself-driving cars, housekeeping robots, and conversational companions hasturned out to be much harder than many people expected. One reason for theserepeating cycles is our limited understanding of the nature and complexity ofintelligence itself. In this paper I describe four fallacies in commonassumptions made by AI researchers, which can lead to overconfident predictionsabout the field. I conclude by discussing the open questions spurred by thesefallacies, including the age-old challenge of imbuing machines with humanlikecommon sense.