Background: Oral histories from 9/11 responders to the World Trade Center(WTC) attacks provide rich narratives about distress and resilience. ArtificialIntelligence (AI) models promise to detect psychopathology in natural language,but they have been evaluated primarily in non-clinical settings using socialmedia. This study sought to test the ability of AI-based language assessmentsto predict PTSD symptom trajectories among responders. Methods: Participantswere 124 responders whose health was monitored at the Stony Brook WTC Healthand Wellness Program who completed oral history interviews about their initialWTC experiences. PTSD symptom severity was measured longitudinally using thePTSD Checklist (PCL) for up to 7 years post-interview. AI-based indicators werecomputed for depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and extraversion along withdictionary-based measures of linguistic and interpersonal style. Linearregression and multilevel models estimated associations of AI indicators withconcurrent and subsequent PTSD symptom severity (significance adjusted by falsediscovery rate). Results: Cross-sectionally, greater depressive language(beta=0.32; p=0.043) and first-person singular usage (beta=0.31; p=0.044) wereassociated with increased symptom severity. Longitudinally, anxious languagepredicted future worsening in PCL scores (beta=0.31; p=0.031), whereasfirst-person plural usage (beta=-0.37; p=0.007) and longer words usage(beta=-0.36; p=0.007) predicted improvement. Conclusions: This is the firststudy to demonstrate the value of AI in understanding PTSD in a vulnerablepopulation. Future studies should extend this application to other traumaexposures and to other demographic groups, especially under-representedminorities.