Research in natural language processing commonly assumes that approaches thatwork well for English and and other widely-used languages are "languageagnostic". In high-resource languages, especially those that are analytic, acommon approach is to treat morphologically-distinct variants of a common rootas completely independent word types. This assumes, that there are limitedmorphological inflections per root, and that the majority will appear in alarge enough corpus, so that the model can adequately learn statistics abouteach form. Approaches like stemming, lemmatization, or subword segmentation areoften used when either of those assumptions do not hold, particularly in thecase of synthetic languages like Spanish or Russian that have more inflectionthan English. In the literature, languages like Finnish or Turkish are held up as extremeexamples of complexity that challenge common modelling assumptions. Yet, whenconsidering all of the world's languages, Finnish and Turkish are closer to theaverage case. When we consider polysynthetic languages (those at the extreme ofmorphological complexity), approaches like stemming, lemmatization, or subwordmodelling may not suffice. These languages have very high numbers of hapaxlegomena, showing the need for appropriate morphological handling of words,without which it is not possible for a model to capture enough word statistics. We examine the current state-of-the-art in language modelling, machinetranslation, and text prediction for four polysynthetic languages: Guaran\'i,St. Lawrence Island Yupik, Central Alaskan Yupik, and Inuktitut. We thenpropose a novel framework for language modelling that combines knowledgerepresentations from finite-state morphological analyzers with Tensor ProductRepresentations in order to enable neural language models capable of handlingthe full range of typologically variant languages.