Abstract
In recent years, a plethora of new metaheuristic algorithms have exploreddifferent sources of inspiration within the biological and natural worlds. Thisnature-inspired approach to algorithm design has been widely criticised. Anotable issue is the tendency for authors to use terminology that is derivedfrom the domain of inspiration, rather than the broader domains ofmetaheuristics and optimisation. This makes it difficult to both comprehend howthese algorithms work and understand their relationships to othermetaheuristics. This paper attempts to address this issue, at least to someextent, by providing accessible descriptions of the most cited nature-inspiredalgorithms published in the last twenty years. It also discusses commonalitiesbetween these algorithms and more classical nature-inspired metaheuristics suchas evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimisation, and finishes with adiscussion of future directions for the field.