Abstract

Deep metric learning papers from the past four years have consistentlyclaimed great advances in accuracy, often more than doubling the performance ofdecade-old methods. In this paper, we take a closer look at the field to see ifthis is actually true. We find flaws in the experimental setup of these papers,and propose a new way to evaluate metric learning algorithms. Finally, wepresent experimental results that show that the improvements over time havebeen marginal at best.

 

Quick Read (beta)