Abstract
Cognitive theories of human language processing often distinguish betweenconcrete and abstract concepts. In this work, we analyze the discriminabilityof concrete and abstract concepts in fMRI data using a range of analysismethods. We find that the distinction can be decoded from the signal with anaccuracy significantly above chance, but it is not found to be a relevantstructuring factor in clustering and relational analyses. From our detailedcomparison, we obtain the impression that human concept representations aremore fluid than dichotomous categories can capture. We argue that fluid conceptrepresentations lead to more realistic models of human language processingbecause they better capture the ambiguity and underspecification present innatural language use.