Abstract
This paper demonstrates that metre is a privileged indicator of authorialstyle in classical Latin hexameter poetry. Using only metrical features,pairwise classification experiments are performed between 5 first-centuryauthors (10 comparisons) using four different machine-learning models. Theresults showed a two-label classification accuracy of at least 95% with samplesas small as ten lines and no greater than eighty lines (up to around 500words). These sample sizes are an order of magnitude smaller than thosetypically recommended for BOW ('bag of words') or n-gram approaches, and thereported accuracy is outstanding. Additionally, this paper explores thepotential for novelty (forgery) detection, or 'one-class classification'. Ananalysis of the disputed Aldine Additamentum (Sil. Ital. Puni. 8:144-225)concludes (p=0.0013) that the metrical style differs significantly from that ofthe rest of the poem.