Abstract
Long-form mental health assessments pose unique challenges for large languagemodels (LLMs), which often exhibit hallucinations or inconsistent reasoningwhen handling extended, domain-specific contexts. We introduce StackedMulti-Model Reasoning (SMMR), a layered framework that leverages multiple LLMsand specialized smaller models as coequal 'experts'. Early layers isolateshort, discrete subtasks, while later layers integrate and refine these partialoutputs through more advanced long-context models. We evaluate SMMR on theDAIC-WOZ depression-screening dataset and 48 curated case studies withpsychiatric diagnoses, demonstrating consistent improvements over single-modelbaselines in terms of accuracy, F1-score, and PHQ-8 error reduction. Byharnessing diverse 'second opinions', SMMR mitigates hallucinations, capturessubtle clinical nuances, and enhances reliability in high-stakes mental healthassessments. Our findings underscore the value of multi-expert frameworks formore trustworthy AI-driven screening.