Abstract
The evolution of technology and education is driving the emergence ofIntelligent & Autonomous Tutoring Systems (IATS), where objective anddomain-agnostic methods for determining question difficulty are essential.Traditional human labeling is subjective, and existing NLP-based approachesfail in symbolic domains like algebra. This study introduces the Approach ofPassive Measures among Educands (APME), a reinforcement learning-basedMulti-Armed Bandit (MAB) framework that estimates difficulty solely from solverperformance data -- marks obtained and time taken -- without requiringlinguistic features or expert labels. By leveraging the inverse coefficient ofvariation as a risk-adjusted metric, the model provides an explainable andscalable mechanism for adaptive assessment. Empirical validation was conductedon three heterogeneous datasets. Across these diverse contexts, the modelachieved an average R2 of 0.9213 and an average RMSE of 0.0584, confirming itsrobustness, accuracy, and adaptability to different educational levels andassessment formats. Compared with baseline approaches-such as regression-based,NLP-driven, and IRT models-the proposed framework consistently outperformedalternatives, particularly in purely symbolic domains. The findings highlightthat (i) item heterogeneity strongly influences perceived difficulty, and (ii)variance in solver outcomes is as critical as mean performance for adaptiveallocation. Pedagogically, the model aligns with Vygotskys Zone of ProximalDevelopment by identifying tasks that balance challenge and attainability,supporting motivation while minimizing disengagement. This domain-agnostic,self-supervised approach advances difficulty tagging in IATS and can beextended beyond algebra wherever solver interaction data is available