Abstract
We propose a novel paradigm for automatic fact-checking that leverages framesemantics to enhance the structured understanding of claims and guide theprocess of fact-checking them. To support this, we introduce a pilot dataset ofreal-world claims extracted from PolitiFact, specifically annotated forlarge-scale structured data. This dataset underpins two case studies: the firstinvestigates voting-related claims using the Vote semantic frame, while thesecond explores various semantic frames based on data sources from theOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Our findingsdemonstrate the effectiveness of frame semantics in improving evidenceretrieval and explainability for fact-checking. Finally, we conducted a surveyof frames evoked in fact-checked claims, identifying high-impact frames toguide future work in this direction.