Abstract
As AI systems take on collaborative roles, they must reason about sharedgoals and beliefs-not just generate fluent language. The Rational Speech Act(RSA) framework offers a principled approach to pragmatic reasoning, butexisting extensions face challenges in scaling to multi-turn, collaborativescenarios. In this paper, we introduce Collaborative Rational Speech Act(CRSA), an information-theoretic (IT) extension of RSA that models multi-turndialog by optimizing a gain function adapted from rate-distortion theory. Thisgain is an extension of the gain model that is maximized in the original RSAmodel but takes into account the scenario in which both agents in aconversation have private information and produce utterances conditioned on thedialog. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CRSA on referential games andtemplate-based doctor-patient dialogs in the medical domain. Empirical resultsshow that CRSA yields more consistent, interpretable, and collaborativebehavior than existing baselines-paving the way for more pragmatic and sociallyaware language agents.