What is causal about causal models and representations?

  • 2025-02-03 17:24:50
  • Frederik Hytting Jørgensen, Luigi Gresele, Sebastian Weichwald
  • 0

Abstract

Causal Bayesian networks are 'causal' models since they make predictionsabout interventional distributions. To connect such causal model predictions toreal-world outcomes, we must determine which actions in the world correspond towhich interventions in the model. For example, to interpret an action as anintervention on a treatment variable, the action will presumably have to a)change the distribution of treatment in a way that corresponds to theintervention, and b) not change other aspects, such as how the outcome dependson the treatment; while the marginal distributions of some variables may changeas an effect. We introduce a formal framework to make such requirements fordifferent interpretations of actions as interventions precise. We prove thatthe seemingly natural interpretation of actions as interventions is circular:Under this interpretation, every causal Bayesian network that correctly modelsthe observational distribution is trivially also interventionally valid, and noaction yields empirical data that could possibly falsify such a model. We provean impossibility result: No interpretation exists that is non-circular andsimultaneously satisfies a set of natural desiderata. Instead, we examinenon-circular interpretations that may violate some desiderata and show how thismay in turn enable the falsification of causal models. By rigorously examininghow a causal Bayesian network could be a 'causal' model of the world instead ofmerely a mathematical object, our formal framework contributes to theconceptual foundations of causal representation learning, causal discovery, andcausal abstraction, while also highlighting some limitations of existingapproaches.

 

Quick Read (beta)

loading the full paper ...