Abstract

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined interms of the principle of alternative possibilities: for the coalition to beresponsible for an outcome, the outcome must take place and the coalitionshould have had a strategy to prevent it. In this paper we argue that in thesettings with imperfect information, not only should the coalition have had astrategy, but it also should have known that it had a strategy, and it shouldhave known what the strategy was. The main technical result of the paper is a sound and complete bimodal logicthat describes the interplay between knowledge and blameworthiness in strategicgames with imperfect information.

 

Quick Read (beta)