Superregular grammars do not provide additional explanatory power but allow for a compact analysis of animal song

  • 2018-11-05 05:07:37
  • Takashi Morita, Hiroki Koda
  • 2

Abstract

A pervasive belief with regard to the differences between human language andanimal vocal sequences (song) is that they belong to different classes ofcomputational complexity, with animal song belonging to regular languages,whereas human language is superregular. This argument, however, lacks empiricalevidence since superregular analyses of animal song are understudied. The goalof this paper is to perform a superregular analysis of animal song, using datafrom gibbons as a case study, and demonstrate that a superregular analysis canbe effectively used with non-human data. A key finding is that a superregularanalysis does not increase explanatory power but rather provides for compactanalysis. For instance, fewer grammatical rules are necessary oncesuperregularity is allowed. This pattern is analogous to a previouscomputational analysis of human language, and accordingly, the null hypothesis,that human language and animal song are governed by the same type ofgrammatical systems, cannot be rejected.

 

Quick Read (beta)

loading the full paper ...