Abstract
It has been observed that large-scale language models capture undesirablesocietal biases, e.g. relating to race and gender; yet religious bias has beenrelatively unexplored. We demonstrate that GPT-3, a state-of-the-art contextuallanguage model, captures persistent Muslim-violence bias. We probe GPT-3 invarious ways, including prompt completion, analogical reasoning, and storygeneration, to understand this anti-Muslim bias, demonstrating that it appearsconsistently and creatively in different uses of the model and that it issevere even compared to biases about other religious groups. For instance,"Muslim" is analogized to "terrorist" in 23% of test cases, while "Jewish" ismapped to "money" in 5% of test cases. We quantify the positive distractionneeded to overcome this bias with adversarial text prompts, and find that useof the most positive 6 adjectives reduces violent completions for "Muslims"from 66% to 20%, but which is still higher than for other religious groups.